Open Journal Systems
ISLEC: An Interactive Learning Scenario Framework
Abstract
Keywords
References
Abdullah, S. and Shariff, A. (2008). The effects of inquiry-based computer simulation with cooperative learning on scientific thinking and conceptual understanding of gas laws. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(4), 387-398.
Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of Inquiry-Based Learning Method on Students’ Academic Achievement in Science Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2 (1), 37-41
Ahmed, S., & Parsons, D. (2013). Abductive Science Inquiry Using Mobile Learning Technologies. In Jovanovic, J. and Chiong, R. (Eds.) Technological and Social Environments for Interactive Learning, Santa Rosa, California: Informing Science Press. (pp.363-90). Available from: http://www.formatex.org/micte2006/pdf/121
Birchfield, D., Ciufo, T., Minyard, G., Qian, G., Savenye, W., Sundaram, H., et al. (2006). SMALLab: A mediated platform for education. Paper presented at the ACM SIGGRAPH, Boston, MA.
Cakir, M. & Irez, S. (2006). Creating a reflective learning community: The role of information technology in Genetics learning. [Online]. [Accessed Feb,20, 2017].
Carroll M. J. (1999). Five Reasons for Scenario-based Design, Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3.
Chi M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In Vosniadou S. (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61-82). Hellsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5, 152–158.
Grigoriadou M. and Papanikolaou, K. (2000). Learning Environments on the WEB: The Pedagogical Role of the Educational Material, Journal Themes in Education, 1(2), 145-161.
Harlen W. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in science and mathematics. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 7(2), 9-33.
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K. & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 32, 283-301
Hung, D. & Chen, D. (2002). Two kinds of scaffolding: The dialectical process within the authenticity-generalizability (A-G) continuum. Education Technology & Society, 5(4), 148-153.
Jaakkola T. & Nurmi S. (2004). Academic impact of learning objects: the case of electric circuits. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Manchester.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation & Competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: International Book Company.
Keys CW, Bryan LA. (2001). Co-Constructing Inquiry-Based Science with Teachers: Essential Research for Lasting Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(6), 631-645.
Lee, H. - S., Linn, M. C., Varma, K., & Liu, O. L. (2010). How do technology-enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 71–90.
Lee, V. S. (1999). Creating a Blueprint for the Constructivist Classroom. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 8(4), 1-4.
Linn, M. C. & Eylon, B-S. (2006). Science education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. In P.A. Alexander and P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology(2ndEd., pp. 511-544). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mayer, R.E. (2004). Should There Be a Three-Strike Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning? The Case for Guided Methods of Instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14 –19
McDermott, L.C. (1990). Research and Computer-Based Instruction: Opportunity for Interaction, American Journal of Physics, 58(5), 452-462.
McDermott, L. & Shaffer, P. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. American Journal of physics, 60(11), 994-1013.
Meir, E., Perry, J., Stal, D., Maruca, S., & Klopfer, E. (2005). How Effective Are Simulated Molecular-Level Experiments for Teaching Diffusion and Osmosis? Cell Biology Education, 4(3), 235-248.
Mikroyannidis, A., Okada, A., Scott,P., Keynes, M. Rusman, H. Specht, M., Stefanov, K., Boytchev, P., Protopsaltis, A., Held, P., Hetzner, S., Kikis-Papadakis, K., Chaimala F. (2013). weSPOT: A Personal and Social Approach to Inquiry-Based Learning. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(14), 2093-2111.
Norton, G., Taylor M., Stewart T. Blackburn, G., Jinks, A., Razdar B. (2012). Designing, developing and implementing a software tool for scenario based learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 28(7), 1083-1102.
Okada, A. (2013). Scientific Literacy in the digital age: tools, environments and resources for co-inquiry. European Scientific Journal, 4, 263–274.
Ronen, M. & Eliahu, M. (2000). Simulation. A bridge between theory and reality: The case of electric circuits. Journal of computer assisted learning, 16(1), 14-26.
Slotta, J.D. (2004).The Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE): Scaffolding Knowledge Integration in the Science Classroom. In M.C. Linn, P. Belland E. & Davis(Eds). Internet Environments for Science Education. 203-232. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates. http://www.encorewiki.org/download/attachments/11961270/SlottaWISE2004.pdf
Srisawasdi N., Panjaburee, P. (2015). Exploring effectiveness of simulation-based inquiry learning in science with integration of formative assessment. Journal of Computers in Education. Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 323–352
Srisawasdi, N., & Sornkhatha, P. (2014). The effect of simulation-based inquiry on students’ conceptual learning and its potential applications in mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(1), 24–49.
Stewart, Τ.Μ., & Brown,Μ.Ε.(2008). Developing interactive scenarios: The value of good planning, hiteboards and table-based schemas. Proceedings of ascilite (pp. 983-990) Melbourne, Australia.
Trundle, K. C., & Bell, R. L. (2010). The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Computers & Education, 54(4), 1078–1088.
Winn, W. D., Stahr, F., Sarason, C., Fruland, R., Oppenheimer, P. and Lee, Y-L. 2005. Learning oceanography from a computer simulation compared with direct experience at sea. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1): 25–42
DOI: 10.21585/ijcses.v1i3.11
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Alexandros G. Papadimitriou