Designing a Student-Centric Computer Science Curriculum: Enabling Flexibility and Personalised Learning in Secondary Schools
Keywords:
student-centred learning, education policy, computer science curriculumAbstract
This study analyses the Computer Science (CS) curricula for grades 9 and 10 in Nepal, emphasising students’ interests and needs within the social context. The study applied the mixed-methods research design. The quantitative data were collected from questionnaire surveys with students and teachers. The qualitative information was collected from curriculum designers, textbook authors, school principals, teachers and students from the Kathmandu valley, Nepal. Random and purposive sampling techniques were used to collect data from the respondents and participants. Data and information were analysed using both quantitative and thematic techniques. The study revealed significant opportunities to enhance the CS curricula by integrating interdisciplinary concepts supported by pragmatic examples. It also highlighted that improving the CS curricula for grades 9 and 10 is a top priority for both schools and students. The study proposes a student-centric CS curriculum development framework that balances between foundational concepts of CS and students' interests. This framework would address the diverse needs of students, considering their physical and mental abilities and interests in their learning. It also suggests that CS students should be included in the curriculum development committee so that they can provide practical feedback and suggestions in the CS curriculum revision process.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete Edition. New York: Longman.
Arce-Trigatti, A., Jorgensen, S., Sanders, J. R., Kaller, H., & Arce, P. E. (2019). The promotion of a revised TPACK Model (TSPACK): Lessons learned from the foundry inspired Steelcase active learning space project. In Proceedings 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.
Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (2012). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In Electronic collaborators (pp. 25-50). Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brougham, D., & Haar, J. (2018). Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.55
Central Board of Secondary Education. (2023a). Senior Secondary School Curriculum 2023-24. CBSE.
Central Board of Secondary Education. (2023b). Computer Applications 2023-24. CBSE.
Comer, D. E., et al., (1989). Computing as a discipline. Communications of the ACM, 32(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1145/63238.63239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/63238.63239
Curriculum Development Center (CDC). (2019a). Secondary education curriculum for elective Computer Science subjects (Grades 9 and 10)], 137-148.
Curriculum Development Centre (CDC), (2019b). National curriculum framework (NCF) for school education in Nepal.
Ezeamuzie, N. O., & Leung, J. S. C. (2022). Computational thinking through an empirical lens: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(2), 481–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211033158
Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
Gharti, S. K., Upreti, S., & Thapa, B. (2020a). Computer Science Grade 9 (2020 AD). Government of Nepal, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Curriculum Development Center. Janak Education Materials Centre Ltd. http://lib.moecdc.gov.np/elibrary/pages/view.php?ref=3668
Gharti, S. K., Upreti, S., & Thapa, B. (2020b). Computer Science Grade 10 (2020 AD). Government of Nepal, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Curriculum Development Center. Janak Education Materials Centre Ltd. https://learning.cehrd.gov.np/pluginfile.php/259/mod_resource/content/1/compscience10.pdf
Hanna, J. L. (2008). A nonverbal language for imagining and learning: Dance education in K–12 curriculum. educational researcher, 37(8), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08326032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08326032
Israel, M., Chung, M. Y., Wherfel, Q. M., & Shehab, S. (2020). A descriptive analysis of academic engagement and collaboration of students with autism during elementary computer science. Computer Science Education, 30(4), 444–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1779521
K–12 CS. (2016). K-12 Computer Science framework. http://www.k12cs.org
Kelly, A. V. (2004). The curriculum: Theory and practice (5th ed). SAGE.
Kuzu, T. S., & Durna, C. (2020). The effect of intelligence and mind games on secondary school students’ writing success. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3).
Matthew, U. O., Kazaure, J. S., & Okafor, N. U. (2021). Contemporary development in e-learning education, cloud computing technology & internet of things. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Cloud Systems. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.31-3-2021.169173
Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoEST). (2019). Nepal Rastriya shiksha niti.
Ministry of Education Bhutan (MoEB). (2021). National School Curriculum Information & Communication Technology (ICT) Curriculum Framework Classes PP-XII.
Ministry of Education Pakistan (MoEP). (2009). National Curriculum for Computer Science Grades IX-X And XI-XII.
Ministry of Law, Justice, and Parliamentary Affairs (MoLJPA). (2015). Nepal Constitution.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Neupane, P. (2020). Policy framework for education development in Nepal. International Education Studies, 13(1), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n1p89
Nouri, J., Zhang, L., Mannila, L., & Norén, E. (2019). Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century skills when learning programming in K-9. Education Inquiry, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1627844
Pinar, W. F. (2019). What is curriculum theory? Routledge.
Powers, K. D. (2003). Breadth-also: A rationale and implementation. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(1), 243-247. https://doi.org/10.1145/792548.611979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/792548.611979
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Xiao, K., & Oshima, J. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and new technologies in inclusive education for minority students: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(20), 13572. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013572
Saloviita, T. (2020). Attitudes of teachers towards inclusive education in Finland. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 64(2), 270-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1541819
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age.
Soto, S. T. (2015). An Analysis of curriculum development. theory and practice in language studies, 5(6), 1129. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0506.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0506.02
Stetter, M. E. (2018). The use of technology to assist school-aged students with high incidence special needs in reading. Education Sciences, 8(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020061
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & De Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century digital skills for workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Webb, M., Davis, N., Bell, T., Katz, Y. J., Reynolds, N., Chambers, D. P., & Sysło, M. M. (2017). Computer science in K-12 school curricula of the 2lst century: Why, what and when? Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9493-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9493-x
Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2019). Transitioning from introductory block-based and text-based environments to professional programming languages in high school computer science classrooms. Computers & Education, 142, 103646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103646
William, A. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age—Second Edition.
Wilson, D. D. (2011). Applying mass customization concepts to core courses: Increasing student‐centered customization and enabling cross‐functional integration. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9(1), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2010.00293.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2010.00293.x
Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st century problem solving in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 60, 565-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7
Zhansulu, S., Batima, T., Temirov, K., Shalgynbayeva, K., Shamurat, O., & Mukhamedzhanov, B. (2022). Supporting children with special educational needs as a socio-pedagogical problem. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(7), 2262-2273. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i7.7692
Zhou, S., Jeong, H., & Green, P. A. (2017). How consistent are the best-known readability equations in estimating the readability of design standards? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2635720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2635720
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Ajay Kumar Yadav, Dr. Dil Prasad Shrestha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
