Students as creators of contexts for learning algorithms: how collaborative context design contributes to a wide range of learning outcomes
Keywords:
computer science education, algorithms, context-based education, collaborative design of contextsAbstract
A context-based approach to education aims to improve students’ meaningful learning and uses authentic situations in which scientific concepts are applied. The use of contexts may contribute to the learning of abstract concepts such as algorithms. The selection of appropriate contexts, however, is challenging for teachers. It is therefore interesting to examine whether students can play an active role in the conception of such contexts and how designing contexts may contribute to student learning. As a case study, we investigated students' design of contexts for learning algorithms in upper secondary education. We developed lessons in which students collaboratively designed contexts and then reflected individually on all contexts proposed. At the end of these lessons, students completed a learner report. The students' design of contexts provided a remarkably wide range of learning outcomes. Students not only reported to have learned more about the lesson topic (algorithmic concepts and the application of these), but the learning reports also reflected learning about the process (learning with contexts, designing contexts, and collaboration). Our findings suggest that designing contexts contributes to active learning. The results of this study may serve as recommendations for future research concerning the role of students in designing contexts.
Downloads
References
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158883
Bennett, J. (2003). Teaching and learning science: A guide to recent research and its applications. London: Continuum.
Bennett, J. (2016). Bringing science to life: Research evidence. In R. Taconis, P. den Brok, & A. Pilot (Eds.), Teachers creating context-based learning environments in science (pp. 21–39). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: SensePublishers. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-684-2_2
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186
Bloemert, J., Paran, A., Jansen, E., & van de Grift, W. (2019). Students’ perspective on the benefits of EFL literature education. The Language Learning Journal, 47(3), 371–384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1298149
Chen, G. D., Fan, C. Y., Chang, C. K., Chang, Y. H., & Chen, Y. H. (2018). Promoting autonomy and ownership in students studying English using digital comic performance-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 955–978. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9597-7
Dagiene, V., & Jevsikova, T. (2012). Reasoning on the content of informatics education for beginners. Social Sciences, 78(4), 84-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ss.78.4.3233
De Groot, A. D. (1980). Learner reports as a tool in the evaluation of psychotherapy. In W. de Moor & H. Wijngaarden (Eds.), Psychotherapy, research and training (pp. 177–182). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press.
Denny, P., Cukierman, D., & Bhaskar, J. (2015). Measuring the effect of inventing practice exercises on learning in an introductory programming course. In Proceedings of the 15th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research (pp. 13–22). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2828959.2828967
Di Fuccia, D.-S., & Ralle, B. (2016). Teachers in learning communities. In R. Taconis, P. den Brok, & A. Pilot (Eds.), Teachers creating context-based learning environments in science (pp. 89–101). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: SensePublishers. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-684-2_6
Dierdorp, A., Bakker, A., van Maanen, J. A., & Eijkelhof, H. M. C. (2014). Meaningful statistics in professional practices as a bridge between mathematics and science: an evaluation of a design research project. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-014-0009-1
Diethelm, I., Koubek, J., & Witten, H. (2011). IniK - Informatik im Kontext: Entwicklungen, Merkmale und Perspektiven. LOG IN, 31(1), 97–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03323736
Evans, C., & Kozhevnikova, M. (2011). Styles of practice: how learning is affected by students’ and teachers’ perceptions and beliefs, conceptions and approaches to learning. Research Papers in Education, 26(2), 133–148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.561973
Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
Gross, P. A. (1997). Joint curriculum design: Facilitating learner ownership and active participation in secondary classrooms. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Habig, S., Blankenburg, J., van Vorst, H., Fechner, S., Parchmann, I., & Sumfleth, E. (2018). Context characteristics and their effects on students’ situational interest in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1154–1175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470349
Henze, I., Bayram-Jacobs, D., Barendsen, E., & Platteel, T. (2020). Het bevorderen van burgerschapscompetenties in de natuurwetenschappelijke vakken met behulp van zelfgemaakt actueel en innovatief lesmateriaal. Retrieved from: https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/228005
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2017). Motivational science teaching using a context-based approach. In B. Akpan (Ed.), Science education: a global perspective (pp. 189–217). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32351-0_10
Jones, J. A. (2019). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through student-generated quizzes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 115–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417735610
Kesteren, B. V. (1993). Applications of De Groot’s “learner report”: A tool to identify educational objectives and learning experiences. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 19(1), 65–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(05)80057-4
King, D. (2012). New perspectives on context-based chemistry education: Using a dialectical sociocultural approach to view teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 51–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.655037
Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography – A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. A. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Miedema, D., Taipalus, T., & Aivaloglou, E. (2023). Students' perceptions on engaging database domains and structures. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2023), (pp. 122-128) New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569727
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Oosterheert, I., Meijer, P. C., & van der Neut, I. (2020). Towards broader views on learning to teach: The case of a pedagogy for learning to teach for creativity. In D. R. Andron & G. Gruber (Eds.), Education beyond crisis (pp. 78–92). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Brill Sense. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432048_005
P21. (2009). P21 Framework Definitions. Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from www.p21.org
Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., & Ralle, B. (2006). “Chemie im Kontext”: A symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041–1062. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702512
Pieters, J. M. (2004). Designing artefacts for inquiry and collaboration when the learner takes the lead. European Educational Research Journal, 3(1), 77–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702512
Pilot, A., & Bulte, A. M. W. (2006). The use of “contexts” as a challenge for the chemistry curriculum: Its successes and the need for further development and understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1087–1112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600730737
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 111–139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
Sevian, H., Dori, Y. J., & Parchmann, I. (2018). How does STEM context-based learning work: what we know and what we still do not know. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1095–1107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470346
Taconis, R., Den Brok, P., & Pilot, A. (2016). Teachers creating context-based learning environments in science. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: SensePublishers. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-684-2
Tight, M. (2016). Phenomenography: the development and application of an innovative research design in higher education research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(3), 319–338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1010284
Ummels, M. H. J., Kamp, M. J. A., De Kroon, H., & Boersma, K. T. (2015). Promoting conceptual coherence within context-based biology education. Science Education, 99(5), 958–985. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21179
Van Oers, B. (1998). From context to contextualizing. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 473–488. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00031-0
Van Vorst, H., & Aydogmus, H. (2021). One context fits all? – analysing students’ context choice and their reasons for choosing a context-based task in chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 43(8), 1250-1272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1908640
Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9(3), 257–280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00028-0
Weurlander, M., Cronhjort, M., & Filipsson, L. (2017). Engineering students’ experiences of interactive teaching in calculus. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 852–865. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1238880
Wierdsma, M., Knippels, M.-C., van Oers, B., & Boersma, K. (2016). Recontextualising cellular respiration in upper secondary biology education. Characteristics and practicability of a learning and teaching strategy. Journal of Biological Education, 50(3), 239–250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2015.1058842
Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Hambrusch, S., & Sands, P. (2016). Expanding computer science education in schools: understanding teacher experiences and challenges. Computer science education, 26(4), 235-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1257418
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Jacqueline Nijenhuis-Voogt, Durdane Bayram-Jacobs, Paulien C. Meijer, Erik Barendsen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
