The Role of School Leadership in the Implementation of Programming and Stem Concepts into Classroom Practice
This short practitioner report discussed the role of the school leadership in the implementation of programming, and STEM concepts into classroom practice in an educational institution in Izmir, Turkey. The study investigated the process of how the school's leadership team including the ICT coordinator made it possible to integrate these relatively new concepts into the school’s curriculum by effectively managing the change process. 50 teachers from different fields including early years, primary, history, science, mathematics, computing, visual arts, and English, were active participants in the implementation program and were asked to regularly reflect on their experiences. The data from the teacher’s reflective journals showed that both programming and STEM concepts were seamlessly integrated into the schools’ curricula and classroom practice. The teachers reported that by receiving training about these concepts and the tools that are necessary for teaching them, was beneficial for supporting the student’s development of 21st-century learning skills such as collaboration, communication and problem-solving. They also explained how the supportive attitude of the leadership team which provided time, resources and training opportunities for teachers, had an impact on the teachers' attitude towards the change process.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Dimmock, C., Kwek, D., & Toh, Y. (2013). Leadership for 21st century learning in Singapore’s high- performing schools. Educational Research and Innovation Leadership for 21st Century Learning (pp. 107–134). Center for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing.
Fullan, M. (1992), Successful School Improvement: The Implementation Perspective and Beyond, Open University Press, London.
Fullan, M. (1994). Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. School Development and the Management of Change Series, 10, ERIC NO ED373391, Pennsylvania.
Fullan, M. (2002). The change. Educational leadership, 59(8), 16-20.
MacNeil, A. J., & Delafield, D. P. (1998). Principal leadership for successful school technology implementation, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED421126.
Martínez Ruiz, M. A., & Sauleda Pareés, N. (1997). The professional development of teachers by means of the construction of collaborative thinking. Journal of In-service Education, 23(2), 241-252.
Minott, M. A. (2010). Portfolio Development, Reflection, Personal Instructional Theory and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. College Quarterly, 13(2), n2.
Stegall, P. (1998). The Principal--Key to Technology Implementation.
Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2014). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior - A literature review. Review of Educational Research.
Weiss, J. (1994). Keeping Up With The Research. Technology& Learning 14, (5), 30-34.
Wilmore, D., & Betz, M. (2000). Information technology and schools: The principal's role. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3(4), 12-19.
Yuen, A. H., Law, N., & Wong, K. C. (2003). ICT implementation and school leadership: Case studies of ICT integration in teaching and learning. Journal of educational Administration, 41(2), 158-170.
Copyright (c) 2019 SERPIL TUTI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).