Cross Curricular Use of Technology for Solving Mathematical Problems: Exploring Angel Falls Interdisciplinary Plan
Keywords:
Real-life experiences, logical reasoning, computational thinking, mathematical thinking, predictions, cross-curricular learning, integrated learningAbstract
This short practitioner report presents information for the planning, teaching and evaluation cycle of a cross curricular Computing, Geography and Mathematics lessons in a 5thgrade classroom. The study focused on both mathematical thinking and Geographical knowledge. The objective of the lesson was to teach children measurement and prediction skills through exploring the Angel Falls, located inside of the Canaima National Park in Venezuela, using the Google expedition application. For the purpose of this study, action research was chosen whereby the findings of this study were used to inform future planning and improve learning. The study found that the students were able to use their logical reasoning to predict the length of many objects including the Angel Falls. The project also found that providing children with real-life learning contexts motivated them to learn and made learning more meaningful. The children were able to transfer and apply their prediction skills during their coding sessions, which highlights the link between mathematical and computational thinking.
Downloads
References
Altrichter, H., Posch, P., Somekh, B., & Feldman, A. (2005). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions. Routledge.
Barefoot, C. A. S. (2014). Computational thinking. [online]. Available from: http://barefootcas. org. uk/barefoot-primary-computing-resources/concepts/computational-thinking/ [Retrieved February 2019]
Beane, J., A. (1995). Curriculum Integration and the Disciplines of Knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 616-622. [online]. Available from: https://www.teachermagazine.com.au/articles/implementing-a-cross-curricular-approach [Retrieved February 2019]
Boaler, A. (2008). What’s math got to do with it? New York, NY: Penguin Group.
Boaler, J. (1998). Open and Closed Mathematics: Student Experiences and Understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 41-62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/749717
Businskas, A.M. (2008). Conversations about Connections: How secondary mathematics teachers conceptualize and contend with mathematical connections. Retrieved from: http://summit.sfu.ca/item/9245
Civil, M. (2002). Chapter 4: Everyday Mathematics, Mathematicians' Mathematics, and School Mathematics: Can We Bring Them Together? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 40-62.
Civil, M. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom, 105-117.
Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1994). Computer environments for learning geometry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10(2), 173-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/8074-298A-KTL2-UQVW
Doerr, H. M., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 143-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003905929557
Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Graham, A. T., & Thomas, M. O. (2000). Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(3), 265-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004094013054
Gray, K. (1991). Vocational education in high school: A modern phoenix? Phi Delta Kappan, 72(6), 437-445.
Guerrero, S., Walker, N., & Dugdale, S. (2004). Technology in support of middle grade mathematics: What have we learned? Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(1), 5-20.
Guido, M. (2018, May 25). 10 Interdisciplinary Teaching Activities Design Steps | Prodigy. [online]. Available from: https://www.prodigygame.com/blog/interdisciplinary-teaching-activities-examples/ [Retrieved February 2019]
Hembree, R., & Dessart, D. (1992). Research on calculator in mathematics education. In J. T. Fey & C. R. Hirsch (Eds.), Calculators in mathematics education: 1992 yearbook (pp. 23-32). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 525-556). New York: MacMillan.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
Quesada, A. R., & Maxwell, M. E. (1994). The effects of using graphing calculators to enhance college students' performance in precalculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(2), 205-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01278922
Turner, E. E., & Font Strawhun, B. T. (2007). Posing Problems that Matter: Investigating School Overcrowding. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(9), 457-463.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715-728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why. The Link Magazine, 20-23.
Wirt, J. (1991). A new federal law on vocational education: Will reform follow? Phi DeltaKappan, 72(6), 424-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.1991.tb03727.x
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
