Cross Curricular Use of Technology for Solving Mathematical Problems: Exploring Angel Falls Interdisciplinary Plan

  • Ceren Zobi
Keywords: Real-life experiences, logical reasoning, computational thinking, mathematical thinking, predictions, cross-curricular learning, integrated learning


This short practitioner report presents information for the planning, teaching and evaluation cycle of a cross curricular Computing, Geography and Mathematics lessons in a 5thgrade classroom. The study focused on both mathematical thinking and Geographical knowledge. The objective of the lesson was to teach children measurement and prediction skills through exploring the Angel Falls, located inside of the Canaima National Park in Venezuela, using the Google expedition application. For the purpose of this study, action research was chosen whereby the findings of this study were used to inform future planning and improve learning. The study found that the students were able to use their logical reasoning to predict the length of many objects including the Angel Falls. The project also found that providing children with real-life learning contexts motivated them to learn and made learning more meaningful. The children were able to transfer and apply their prediction skills during their coding sessions, which highlights the link between mathematical and computational thinking.



Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ceren Zobi

I am a math teacher

Graduated  from Yeditepe University Master Programme Educational Leadership and Planning and Math Teaching 


Altrichter, H., Posch, P., Somekh, B., & Feldman, A. (2005). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions. Routledge.

Barefoot, C. A. S. (2014). Computational thinking. [online]. Available from: http://barefootcas. org. uk/barefoot-primary-computing-resources/concepts/computational-thinking/ [Retrieved February 2019]

Beane, J., A. (1995). Curriculum Integration and the Disciplines of Knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 616-622. [online]. Available from: [Retrieved February 2019]

Boaler, A. (2008). What’s math got to do with it? New York, NY: Penguin Group.

Boaler, J. (1998). Open and Closed Mathematics: Student Experiences and Understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 41-62

Businskas, A.M. (2008). Conversations about Connections: How secondary mathematics teachers conceptualize and contend with mathematical connections. Retrieved from:

Civil, M. (2002). Chapter 4: Everyday Mathematics, Mathematicians' Mathematics, and School Mathematics: Can We Bring Them Together? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 40-62.

Civil, M. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom, 105-117.

Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1994). Computer environments for learning geometry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10(2), 173-197.

Doerr, H. M., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 143-163.

Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Graham, A. T., & Thomas, M. O. (2000). Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(3), 265-282.

Gray, K. (1991). Vocational education in high school: A modern phoenix? Phi Delta Kappan, 72(6), 437-445.

Guerrero, S., Walker, N., & Dugdale, S. (2004). Technology in support of middle grade mathematics: What have we learned? Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(1), 5-20.

Guido, M. (2018, May 25). 10 Interdisciplinary Teaching Activities Design Steps | Prodigy. [online]. Available from: [Retrieved February 2019]

Hembree, R., & Dessart, D. (1992). Research on calculator in mathematics education. In J. T. Fey & C. R. Hirsch (Eds.), Calculators in mathematics education: 1992 yearbook (pp. 23-32). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 525-556). New York: MacMillan.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.

Quesada, A. R., & Maxwell, M. E. (1994). The effects of using graphing calculators to enhance college students' performance in precalculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(2), 205-215.

Turner, E. E., & Font Strawhun, B. T. (2007). Posing Problems that Matter: Investigating School Overcrowding. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(9), 457-463.

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715-728.

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.

Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why. The Link Magazine, 20-23.

Wirt, J. (1991). A new federal law on vocational education: Will reform follow? Phi DeltaKappan, 72(6), 424-433.

How to Cite
Zobi, C. (2019). Cross Curricular Use of Technology for Solving Mathematical Problems: Exploring Angel Falls Interdisciplinary Plan. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 2(5), 45-51.